ncogneto_01 wrote:

What one of your juvenile children call private property and the other juvenile child call private property is subject to your (the parent's) definition and arbitrary will -- that is the law of your household.

That micro-example can be extended...

Andrew55 wrote:
Hi Drew,

Great question. Our trust indenture (contract) is applicable anywhere in the world and recognizable by any common law jurisdiction, which means any country that stems historically from the Union Jack and some other countries as well. We have numerous GTEN members in Canada as well as UK, Australia, New Zealand, etc. No changes will be needed in any of the wording.

Cheers,
Christian...

Let me take this to a totally different level.

The USA is so intrusive (NSA et al), and NYS so paranoid (since 911) that if you push this it will only get worse, here's how: let's say you took this to NYS court and you lost in the lower court but eventually won in the court of appeals for NYS, such that your case is now the law for the state.

Here's is what would happen with lightening speed, the NYS legislature would get together to create a law that would specifically define what specific...

The fact that she officiated for you twice before should tell you that she isn't a hardcore stickler.

You are refusing to recognize the fundamentals of what I told you:

1) everything is about 'information and belief' apparently even though she might have had doubts about your ID for the 1st or 2nd jobs, she did it anyway trusting more than proving.

Apparently, there was something about the third situation that triggered a red flag, and given your overblown response she is probably...

I sense a blurring of lines...I reference that notary public license law but I am not standing on that. There are several pieces to this.

The Notary officiated twice. On a third time the Notary failed to officiate without providing verifiable lawful cause for the failure. This is a breach of contract.

Second, the Notary is public servant and has a fiduciary duty to officiate provided they are shown what they require, which is at least "satisfactory evidence". In this case the Notary was...

This is the first webinar in our Private Trust Education series. For this week only the entire webinar is available with a donation of only $189!!! That's only a third of the normal cost!!! Register here

Introduction:


Our Mission/ Operating as a Trustee:


Law Forms:...

"credible witness" only applies in certain states (ie: florida). When I was a notary in NY you could not do that, laws change often so it's possible that that could be the case there now but I doubt it.

In Fl unlike NY a notary DOES have the legal right to refused to officiate for any reason or no reason at all.

I've done the 'Credible Witness' notarization many times in FL, it's a painful process that most notaries are unfamiliar with and would choose not to do because it has so many moving...

ncogneto_01 wrote:

I was referring to them witnessing attestation, affirmation, etc.

I recently took the notary public class just for the education on it and that's what they told us: If we didn't feel comfortable with the I.D., we didn't know them personally, and they don't have a credible witness, don't do it. Of course we just skimmed through the book and its only an 8 hour class so I don't have much faith that notaries know the laws concerning their role. The biggest complaint by the instructor (who was also...

I like where you are going with this...

-"Perhaps a Holding Trust, as a Living Man type trust would want to take the place of the CORPORATION from the above scenario. It could lien the PERSON and only avail itself through the PUBLIC filings. Of course the Holding Trust would be liened privately by the Master Trust by borrowing commodities and loaning lawful money to be converted to legal tender for the PERSON to borrow."

I couldn't have said it better myself.

Just found out about this, some very interesting language was used, now that I have been alerted to how definitions of words are often used to mean things that would not be immediately apparent in everyday common language usage:


_____________________________________________________________________
"In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny, there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use...

I understand the theory and concept of how, but my question is why. If you're not using the PERSON, who cares who comes after it? If you did for some reason have an attachment to the PERSON, would you really want to have the Man lien the PERSON? How would you stand behind that and enforce it in a court type scenario without looking dual-minded?

An idea that I had, if your absolutely attached to your PERSON and refuse to let it go; what if you set up a PUBLIC ENTITY(LLC, 503, etc.) or was...

Hi folks,

We received the following question in an email from one of our members. It struck me as a great question to learn from, so I'm sharing it here along with the answer provided. The member's personal information has been removed.

Question

My person has received a summons for jury duty next month. I submitted a request for permanent exemption claiming:

1. Undue hardship
2. Extreme inconvenience
3. Disqualifying condition - not a "citizen of the United States" (affidavit attached to...

The GTEN Forum is a meeting place for free inhabitants to discuss a wide range of topics related to consciousness, natural law, the organic laws, rights, freedom, sovereignty, commerce, contracts, trusts, asset protection, conscious creation and the like.

The Main Discussion Forum, Special Offers & Events Forum, Bad Cop No Donut, and Cancer Cures Forum are free and open to everyone, as long as you subscribe to the GTEN.org Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and forum rules. We hope this forum will be...

This is the GTEN.org FAQ. For GTEN Forum information, please see the Forum Selection and Rules post.

What is a trust?

Black's Law 2nd Edition:

An equitable or beneficial right or title to land or other property, held for the beneficiary by another person, in whom resides the legal title or ownership, recognized and enforced by courts of chancery.

An obligation arising out of a confidence reposed in the trustee or representative, who has the legal title to...