Well, that's quite the list of patriot/sovereign/creditor movement topics, most of which combine facts, opinions and myth. We touch on some of these items throughout our courses. My personal opinion is that most of the underlying realities are true, if perhaps also a bit misunderstood, yet the commonly discussed remedies are often ill-conceived, half baked solutions. The reason is that the underlying realities that are true are provable, and the remedies so far have not been shown to consistently work. I think there are a number of reasons the proffered remedies demonstrate inconsistent results. The two big ones, in my mind, are: 1) They're not quite correct in their approach and/or execution, and, 2) The powers that be keep changing the response to these attempts to protect their interests. So whenever a remedy such as one of these starts working, policies are changed to halt that remedy's effectiveness. It's like a shell game, where the prize keeps moving to keep you guessing.
We've made a deliberate choice to teach topics that are grounded in authoritative source material and that consistently work because they're unquestionably real and provably so. We've had our eyes on the questions you raise for a decade, and we do watch the developments in those areas quite closely. When any one of them meets our criteria for validation by authoritative sources and provable, consistent results, we'll be glad to teach it. We want the armor we give you to be strong and flawless. I like to think of the topics you raise as cracks in the armor of the powers that be, having little or nothing to do with my armor, which is stronger. And the cracks in the armor of the powers that be do seem to be widening, which is always interesting to keep an eye on.